http://wadearnold.com/blog/flash/zendamfd-now-we-are-going The spoils of the integration of PHP and ActionScript Wed, 19 May 2010 07:10:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://wadearnold.com/blog/flash/zendamfd-now-we-are-going/comment-page-1#comment-2924 Bob Tribit Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:08:42 +0000 http://wadearnold.com/blog/?p=241#comment-2924 This is interesting to me. I am specifically interested in this and trying to make it work with Flash Builder 4. I think with the integration of the Zend Framework and Flash Builder 4 that this is the right direction to take things. It leaves the model on the php side...happy. I am excited about this as well and glad to see someone is already working on it. I will look for something I can contribute to this specifically... This is interesting to me. I am specifically interested in this and trying to make it work with Flash Builder 4. I think with the integration of the Zend Framework and Flash Builder 4 that this is the right direction to take things. It leaves the model on the php side…happy. I am excited about this as well and glad to see someone is already working on it. I will look for something I can contribute to this specifically…

]]> http://wadearnold.com/blog/flash/zendamfd-now-we-are-going/comment-page-1#comment-1432 james Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:17:20 +0000 http://wadearnold.com/blog/?p=241#comment-1432 An interesting approach, it seems odd to build on the Zend Framework and not continue their style of coding (ie. ZendAmfDs instead of Zend_Amf_Ds) and I can only say that will certainly keep you from getting this project included by any means in the overall scheme of things. I’m not sure, however, I completely understand the benefit here, in fact it seems like it adds additional complexity to that which was already simple. I’ll agree that the inclusion of an XML file might make it easier to configure the services but I think that’s negligible. My understanding of the benefit for things like Blaze DS wasn’t the ease of use but the built-in functionality of data paging and management which I do not see exhibited here. If nothing else, at least it shows promise that people are pursuing alternative options to the standard array of data services providers for AMF systems. An interesting approach, it seems odd to build on the Zend Framework and not continue their style of coding (ie. ZendAmfDs instead of Zend_Amf_Ds) and I can only say that will certainly keep you from getting this project included by any means in the overall scheme of things. I’m not sure, however, I completely understand the benefit here, in fact it seems like it adds additional complexity to that which was already simple. I’ll agree that the inclusion of an XML file might make it easier to configure the services but I think that’s negligible. My understanding of the benefit for things like Blaze DS wasn’t the ease of use but the built-in functionality of data paging and management which I do not see exhibited here. If nothing else, at least it shows promise that people are pursuing alternative options to the standard array of data services providers for AMF systems.

]]>