<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GZip compression is not part of AMF!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wadearnold.com/blog/flash/gzip-compression-is-not-part-of-amf/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wadearnold.com/blog/flash/gzip-compression-is-not-part-of-amf</link>
	<description>The spoils of the integration of PHP and ActionScript</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:48:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tapasvi Moturu</title>
		<link>http://wadearnold.com/blog/flash/gzip-compression-is-not-part-of-amf/comment-page-1#comment-9690</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapasvi Moturu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wadearnold.com/blog/?p=221#comment-9690</guid>
		<description>AMF although being a binary protocol doesnt guarantee that the data trasnferred accross the wire is either compresses or in binary for.
Consider that the amf call actualy returns the XML string. 

The network packet actually contains XML data along with all the notes.
This means you will carry all the XML data with the repeated node information causing bloat on the network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMF although being a binary protocol doesnt guarantee that the data trasnferred accross the wire is either compresses or in binary for.<br />
Consider that the amf call actualy returns the XML string. </p>
<p>The network packet actually contains XML data along with all the notes.<br />
This means you will carry all the XML data with the repeated node information causing bloat on the network</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerton ten Ham</title>
		<link>http://wadearnold.com/blog/flash/gzip-compression-is-not-part-of-amf/comment-page-1#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerton ten Ham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 07:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wadearnold.com/blog/?p=221#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>I always thought that AMF was a binary protocol. So one could argue the performance gain you have when compression is on.

Just keep up the good work your are doing (i know that i appreciate it!)
-Gerton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that AMF was a binary protocol. So one could argue the performance gain you have when compression is on.</p>
<p>Just keep up the good work your are doing (i know that i appreciate it!)<br />
-Gerton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
